Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10135 12
Original file (10135 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

She SAAR TE OICE BOAT. SUNTH tats
WE, MOLIRTHOUSE ROAT. SUITE 1004

ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JET
Docket No. 10135-12
6 Aug 13

GE
ed
queaita |

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 August 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 4 Mar 13, a
copy of which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and

votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

The Board members also considered your request for a personal
appearance; however, they found that the issues in the case were
adequately documented and that a personal appearance would not
materially add to the Board’s understanding of the issues

involved. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been
denied.
Docket No. 10135-12

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitied to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new. and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board, In this regard, it is important to keep. in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official ‘records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
‘existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN e
Executive Dirket

Enclosure: HQMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 4 Mar 13

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 02446-12

    Original file (02446-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 2446-12 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05848-12

    Original file (05848-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 22 Oct 12, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05737-12

    Original file (05737-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2013. Documentary material ‘considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 22 Oct 12, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1099-13

    Original file (NR1099-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 7 May 13, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0629-13

    Original file (NR0629-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 September 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 24 Jun 13, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1101-13

    Original file (NR1101-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 September 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 7 May 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2239-13

    Original file (NR2239-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 21 May 13, a copy of which is attached. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0401-13

    Original file (NR0401-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 7 May 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2329-13

    Original file (NR2329-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05273-12

    Original file (05273-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.